Jurivo
AI legal assistant
AI & Automation
We design AI systems that connect to your data, tools and workflows — automating repetitive work and helping teams operate faster.
The situation
Every company we talk to recognises at least two of these. None of them are technology problems on the surface — they are all workflow problems underneath.
Your team manually processes documents that arrive in the same shape every week.
Customer questions come back again and again, and each one still needs a person.
Information lives across emails, documents, drives and systems that do not talk to each other.
Employees spend hours copying information between platforms.
Qualified leads go cold because nobody followed up quickly enough.
What we build
An assistant that only answers questions is a demo. A system that reads, decides and acts inside your tools is infrastructure.
Conversational access to the knowledge your company already has — grounded in your documents, not in a general model’s guesswork.
Systems that take a goal and carry out multi-step work across your tools, with the checkpoints a business actually needs.
Extraction, classification and validation for invoices, contracts, reports and forms, with a human in the loop where it matters.
The handoffs between people and systems, made automatic — from intake through approval to the record that closes it out.
Retrieval over your own content, so answers cite a source your team can open and verify.
The connective work that makes the rest possible: CRM, ERP, email, storage, internal databases and third-party APIs.
How it fits together
The system sits between the tools you already have. It reads what arrives, decides what it is, and acts — inside those same tools.
Inputs
DIVEX AI System
Outputs
How we work
We map the existing workflow as it really runs — including the parts nobody documented.
We identify where AI and automation create real leverage, and where they would only add a layer.
We create the system and connect it to the tools your team already uses.
We measure it in production, improve what underperforms and expand what works.
Capabilities
Questions
No. Most of the value comes from connecting systems that are already scattered. Consolidation can follow later, once the workflow proves what actually needs to move.
We scope data access to what the system genuinely needs, keep processing inside infrastructure you control where that is required, and document what leaves your boundary. Specifics are agreed before anything is built.
We design for that. Systems cite sources, surface confidence, and route to a person where a wrong answer would be expensive. Automation replaces the repetitive part of the work, not the accountability for it.
A focused first workflow is usually a matter of weeks rather than months. We deliberately start with one process that matters, prove it in production, and expand from there.
Let's talk
Tell us how you work. We will tell you which parts are worth automating and which are not.